Differentiated Instruction
September 28th, 2009Olivia addressed the importance of academic ability grouping at the recent forum at Brown Middle School.
Do you support academic ability grouping, even if it means groups of students may move through the curriculum at different speeds?
Olivia: Yes, I support academic ability grouping in many areas. This is the fundamental concept behind “differentiated instruction,” which means students will be taught material that is at their optimal level of challenge.
When I taught 4th grade, I would give my students a pre-test at the beginning of a math unit—for example, on geometry. The students who already knew most of the material would not go through the lessons that the majority of the class did. Instead, those children who were ready for advanced geometry work would have the opportunity to move ahead to challenging geometry projects—applying what they knew to real-life situations and learning advanced concepts. Similarly, students who had not mastered even the basic concepts on the geometry pre-test would get assignments specifically designed to provide the foundation they needed to move ahead to the grade-level work.
Students must be able to move between groups as they master the material. Ability grouping needs to allow students to put forth effort, make progress, and be promoted to accelerated groups. If students are simply put into a track without the possibility of movement, the advanced kids may not put forth their best effort and many kids in the basic track get discouraged and won’t achieve to their potential either.
To summarize, I support ability grouping when the groups are temporary and frequently evaluated to ensure students are working to their potential.
Read the complete transcript of the Q&A w/ School Committee Candidates in Contested Races From the School Committee Forum at Brown Middle School, June 2, 2009

